Did anybody read this on CNN?

February 18, 2006

There was a recent court case where a child was sexually abused and the the defendant said that because the child was not a virgin the “damage” would be less impacting on her than if she had been a virgin.

Another piece of BS served to you on a plate. What the hell does that mean is the question? Of course it is DAMAGING if someone RAPES you dosn’t fucking matter if you have prior experience or not. Not speaking from personal experience of sexual abuse it must be horribly traumatic for the victim. Whoever made that ruling needs to totally be fired….


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: